Monday, August 22, 2016

Auto Dealers Under Imminent Threat of Security Breaches, Helion Technologies Announces

Auto Dealers Under Imminent Threat of Security Breaches

Auto Dealers Under Imminent Threat of Security Breaches and Data Theft

Car Dealers Must Be Prepared To Deal with Security Breaches
Timonium, MD – August 22nd, 2016-- Helion Technologies announced today that 75 percent of small businesses have experienced security breaches in the last 12 months, according to a recent survey conducted by Osterman Research. The findings were published in a July 2016 report titled IT Security at Small to Mid-Size Businesses (SMBs): 2016 Benchmark Survey. The results were obtained from organizations ranging in size from 100 to 3,000 employees.

"These findings are similar to what we are seeing in auto dealerships, and unfortunately we are seeing the rates of attack continuing to increase," said Erik Nachbahr, President of Helion Technologies. "Every time a hacker successfully breaches a network and profits from the attempt, 10 more hackers get into the game."

Small businesses, defined as having fewer than 500 employees, were most vulnerable to security attacks as they are less likely to have full-time security experts on staff. Nearly one-third of the survey respondents have two or fewer IT personnel focused solely on security, indicating that smaller companies do not have the expertise necessary to deal with attacks, infections and other problems quickly and efficiently.

"Security doesn't have to be this massive, complicated problem for auto dealers," said Nachbahr. "Prevention is actually pretty inexpensive and easy. What's really costly is when a breach happens. A single incident may result in the loss of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Yet with simple technology precautions as well as employee awareness and training, these incidents can easily be prevented."

According to the survey, the most successful form of security attacks included:

  • Phishing: 43 percent of SMBs experienced a successful phishing attack. Phishing attacks appear in the form of emails that appear to come from a legitimate entity or person, such as a bank. The message contains a link that takes the victim to a fraudulent website; for example, a website that looks exactly like the bank's website. The user is prompted to provide login information, which is then used by the hackers to access the dealerships' real bank account.

    Spear phishing takes the scam one step further and targets specific individuals within organizations. In auto dealerships, typically this is the controller or someone in the accounting office. The employee receives an email that appears to be from a dealer principal or general manager, with a request and instructions on how to wire money to an account. Once the money is wired, there is no way to retrieve it.

  • Virus or Worm Infection: 36 percent of SMBs experienced these types of attacks, which are computer codes that replicate themselves and spread through a computer network. Viruses and worms are designed to destroy data, use available memory and bring systems to a halt.

  • Ransomware: 23 percent of SMBs were victims of ransomware, a type of malware that infects computer networks and lies dormant for a period of time. Once activated, ransomware encrypts all files in an organization and the hackers demand a ransom for their release.

The survey also found that for SMBs, overall security-related costs have increased an average of 23 percent in the last 12 months. The increase is likely correlated to the growing number of security threats; for example, in 2015 the number of phishing URLs increased by 55 percent and the total volume of new malware increased by 14 percent.

One of the primary targets in SMBs is data. In auto dealerships there is enormous value in all of the customer records kept in dealership management systems and customer relationship management applications. Stolen login credentials, credit card numbers, social security numbers and account numbers can be used for a variety of purposes; including gaining access to corporate financial accounts, selling credit card numbers on the open market or creating new identities for criminals.

Auto dealership employees can minimize the threat posed by phishing, worms, viruses and ransomware by doing the following:
  • Don't click on any links in emails or download documents sent by an unknown party
      
  • If you receive an email from your bank, don't use that link to go to the bank's website. Instead open a new window to navigate to your bank's website. If you have any concerns about the content of the message you received, call your bank
      
  • Require verbal authorization for all email requests to wire or transfer money
      
  • Keep every computers' operating system and other software applications up to date, installing patches and updates regularly
       
  • Use firewall and antivirus software
      

For more information contact Helion at 443-541-1500
or visit http://www.heliontechnologies.com.

About Helion Automotive Technologies

Helion...Putting Your Dealership in the FAST LANE! Helion Automotive Technologies is a leading IT solutions provider, providing auto dealers with faster, more efficient networks and secure data protection. From managed services to IT assistance and service desk help, Helion offers both short-term IT fixes and long-term planning so dealers can focus on what matters most: selling more cars. Helion has specialized in IT for more than ten years and works with 650+ auto dealers nationwide. Dealers can request a free assessment of their IT needs at www.heliontechnologies.com.

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Get Active and Avoid Becoming Reactive to Dealership Reviews


Act, Don’t React
to Negative Online Reviews

Consumers increasingly use their smartphones to research which businesses they should patronize.
These days, online reviews are a big part of that decision process. If managed incorrectly, these reviews can easily flip your prospective customer away from your dealership and into the lap of your competition. And it’s not just a bad review, it’s how you respond to them and interact with the customer. Responsiveness is key -- Keep in mind that saying nothing is almost as bad as saying the wrong thing.

But what should you say when an upset customer takes to a review site and bashes you, your business, or your staff -- when you weren’t even aware there was a problem?

An interesting article on Moz.com shares some great facts about online reviews and how to respond, both correctly and incorrectly

Owners and managers can feel blindsided when a negative review appears.
Quite often they aren’t even aware of the problem. Most business owners and managers care about their businesses, value their customers and, when negative reviews appear, take them personally. To summarize the article, the owner of a food truck involved in a really busy festival woke up to a negative review from a customer complaining about the length of time it took to get the food and that the food itself was not equitable to the price paid. The owner essentially blasted the consumer with all sorts of excuses and some aggressive insults. This, in turn gave the consumer an even lower opinion of the business. As a result they edited the review from 2-stars to 1, making the situation even worse. The article dissects the actual review along with the owner’s response and shares how the author would have chosen to respond had they been in a similar situation.

Rather than rehash the whole article (which you should definitely read), I’ll focus on why responding appropriately to negative online reviews is so important.

When it comes to a negative online review, it is important to keep in mind that they are on public forums. They can be read by other prospective customers and are typically memorialized forever. In enough quantity, reviews can make or break your business. While each and every negative review due to a poor customer experience needs an individualized and appropriate response, it’s difficult to advise an umbrella policy. That being said, one easy rule to remember is this:

When reading and preparing a response to a negative online review, imagine that you’re standing in the middle of your showroom floor packed with customers who are considering buying a vehicle from you. The customer is directly in front of you stating their upset loudly enough for everyone to hear -- both what the customer says and any response you give. Because of that, your response can impact whether or not other customers choose to complete their transactions with you.

This simple action can help you be more thoughtful in your response. It’s highly unlikely (hopefully) that you would rant at and insult this upset customer in front of the other customers.

In reality there is little, if any, difference between talking irately to a customer live in the showroom surrounded by other customers, or in responding abrasively to a negative online review – except for one major detail:
The potential size of your audience!

While the handful of customers in your showroom are the only people to witness this event, EVERY customer that visits your online review sites will witness it in perpetuity.

So which is more important? Well, they both are.
How you handle a guest standing in front of you and fix a problem, or apologize for a mistake, is exactly how you should handle a customer online. It doesn’t matter whether you think the customer is wrong, is overreacting, or just trying to get something for nothing. Take your personal feelings out of the equation and focus on improving (or at least attempting to improve) THIS customer’s experience – which will also show every other customer that you care and would be willing to help them if a problem should arise.

People do business with people they like.
Make sure that everything you do – whether that’s in person or in an online interaction – reinforces the message that you care about your customers and are willing to work hard to rectify any problem. You won’t be able to make everyone happy -- but other prospective customers will see that you tried. And in the end, that’s all that really matters to them.

Are Your Dealership Vendor Results Skewed?

True or False: Your Vendor Results Are Skewed?

True or False:
Your Vendor Results Are Skewed?


Every dealership in the automotive industry has some sort of relationship with vendors and their products.
Whether it be for a CRM, Website Design, DMS, Email Marketing, Call Reporting…You name it and it’s covered by a business in this industry. And while most will have the main argument in their quest for your business, the age old pitch “We Will Show You The Results You’ve Been Missing”, this isn’t the largest transgression against these vendors. What is, and what this article will focus on, is the TRUE problem with so many in the automotive vendor industry; false & fluffed reporting of the results their products provide.
  
Looking at the dealerships results, in comparison to what the vendor provides, is the key in a long lasting relationship with these suppliers. However, with so many dealer programs and vendors layering and clouding results, it’s become difficult to disassociate the good from the bad, no matter the size of the business. In some cases name recognition and sheer size of the vendor can make it simpler to be able to skew results. Viewing the warning signs for your vendors, and what they’re supposedly bringing to the table vs. what they’re actually doing for you, may help to clean house and find the right and TRUE product for your dealership. Here’s a quick guide in what to look for when being provided results from a vendor.
  • Results that are vague & not analytical. Look at Google analytics for an example. When viewing stats on a reporting engine such as this, you’ll find a detailed (and sometimes frustrating) amount of information, which helps any user determine where every view, click, and exact lead came from, AND, how they got there. Now looking at many current automotive vendors, there’s only a select few who will provide true detailed views into how every facet of every lead has come through and how their product associated with this lead. A true reporting tool MUST show detail rather than a summary, and must give the dealership the chance to make the choice themselves, if they choose to do a deep dive into the analytics. Not the other way around.
       
  • Reports showing the vendor’s product or service sold most of your vehicles. A dealership in most cases is a well oiled machine, staffed by sales personnel who spend all day with one goal; to sell cars. There is NOT ONE vendor in this industry that can attribute most of a dealerships sales to their product, it’s just not possible. An automotive supplier is there to help attain a dealership additional sales, more leads, and better organized growth and sustainability in the ever growing and changing automotive market. Unless the dealership has only vendors and no sales personnel whatsoever, there will never be a product to verify most sales can be linked to their product or service. If they do, it’s time to rethink who you’re working with.
      
  • Product results that lead into a multitude of that same vendors’ other products. This is a tricky one, because there are many businesses who work with dealerships, who do have terrific additions to their arsenal of products. Where to be weary is when the reporting that is provided to the dealership specifically points in the direction of another product they provide. If it seems coincidental, it most likely isn’t.
      
  • Tardy/Late Reporting. When using reputable vendors or suppliers, almost all of these will, at the beginning, provide a calendar of reporting to be expected. If reports and results are meant to be month-to-month, on the first, they should always be on the 1st. When the reporting becomes staggered and/or consistently late, in some cases it’s because the numbers do not reflect good on the product. Some may just be using a few extra days of data to bump the numbers, however some may be finding alternative methods to create “better” data in the eyes of the dealership. It’s not ethical, and it happens more than most would think.
  
Too many vendors are equating a correlation to a causality; trying to influence dealers that because they may have had a slight touch on the customer, they must be the only one to award credit with that sale. This is not every vendor, but the number of honest reports is outweighed by the dishonest in so many areas. Preemptively targeting certain cautionary areas of vendors before signing contracts is a must these days. This must be done in order to find transparent companies that show every detail to better the dealership, not themselves. For example, automotive suppliers such as CRMSuite, and its CRM Software, provide detailed and analytical reporting with a complete layer of transparency. This allows the dealership management to oversee the entire operation without any of the cloudiness that appears in so many results and reporting by other vendors. Every aspect of all reporting needs to show the dealership, its personnel, and any outside eyes looking in, a complete view with no filters or gaps between the data and the ROI. Because, if that dealership cannot fluff their bottom line, why should any vendors be doing it?

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Cars.com Acquisition of DealerRater Benefits Consumers and Car Dealers

Why Cars.com Acquiring DealerRater Is A Good Thing For Everyone 

Cars.com Acquires DealerRater.com:
This is Good for both Car Dealers and Consumers

Recent news of the Cars.com acquisition of DealerRater.com is creating quite a stir because an automotive ratings and reviews GIANT will be born when the transaction is complete.

       
The deal is expected to close in August or Early September 2016. The new Cars.com will have the largest car dealer consumer reviews platform in the automotive industry, with more than 4 million car buying and servicing consumer submitted reviews. While there surely are many dealerships as well as sales personnel who have seen this news, many have surely passed it by, not thinking twice. However, there should be a pause, because this acquisition will effect every facet of the auto industry. The greatest eventuality with this acquisition (if done correctly), will be that car dealerships with good reputations will have the opportunity to let more automotive consumers than ever before know about their hard earned reputation for better customer service.
        

Online reviews are more important than ever before for all consumer products.

Automotive reviews are even more important to car buying and servicing consumers because the purchase of a new or used vehicle is usually their second largest financial commitment, second only to purchasing a home. In addition, this importance of reviews rings even more true when talking about service departments. And, unknown to many auto sales professionals, individual dealership sales personnel can be reviewed by car buyers and service customers. Simply put, reviews are a way for consumers to feel more comfortable throughout every dimension of the dealership and their ownership life cycle. Since 71% of customers surveyed say they bought their vehicle because they liked, trusted and respected their salesperson, this comfort level can effect your dealership both positively as well as negatively. Having said that, there’s a few things that need to be understood to help better attract and serve the “review educated” consumer.
         

With reviews so important to the consumer, it’s no wonder that 85% of customers make up their mind about purchasing a vehicle before they leave the house.

Customer reviews are a web enabled extension of the "word of mouth" effect that results in a comfortable community for automotive consumers. This acquisition could make it easier and more effective for all dealerships to better improve and monitor their customer services and business procedures that make or break the dealership's reputation. The new Cars.com will allow the dealership to keep better track of their reviews throughout a multitude of websites more efficiently, which has been difficult for most car dealers in recent years. 

It is important to know that dealerships have the option of being alerted when a negative review is submitted by one of their customers. This feature helps the dealership take more effective control of their reputation, resolve customer concerns when they occur and promptly provide resolution. With individual sales personnel reviews, consumers can see how well rated each staff member is before ever walking through the door. Matching the customer with the car salesperson who best suits their preferences and needs. Many automotive sales professionals may believe that sales personnel reviews are a worrisome item to have available for customers, however this can be used to provides a two prong approach to keeping your dealership ahead of others. It provides salesperson accountability and a personnel driving source for your dealership. The individual positive reviews leave the consumer feeling comfortable and the negative reviews allow management to reassess which staff members are working out best for their sales teams.
            

This acquisition will create a plethora of opportunities for dealerships to improve the results from their digital marketing strategy.

With the amount of dealership advertising budget currently allocated to paid search engine advertising (SEM), this acquisition will allow for a more efficient review strategy that SHOULD (if done properly), increase the impact of a dealership's good reputation and more importantly, increase sales at good dealerships while steering more consumers away from the handful of bad apples that besmirch the reputation of the entire industry.

Friday, July 15, 2016

J.D. Power Automotive Recap

Follow J.D. Power Cars on Facebook!
Follow @JDPowerCars on Twitter!

Consumer Advisory: J.D. Power to Release
2016 U.S. Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study Results on July 27

PowerSteering: 2017 Kia Sportage Review

The latest Sportage is absolutely worthy of consideration, and while fuel economy remains unimpressive, everything else about this Kia is improved for the better. Find out what else we learned about the all-new Sportage crossover SUV...

2016 U.S. Auto Insurance Study

Large U.S. auto insurers drag industrywide customer satisfaction down due to price perception, according to the recently released J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Auto Insurance Study.SM

Buyer's Guides and New Car Previews

Top-Rated Family Cars in the 2016 Initial Quality Study

In this 2016 Family Cars buyer's guide, we highlight the top-rated models in the 2016 U.S. IQS, those vehicles earning a Power Circle Rating of 4 or 5 out of a possible 5 for initial quality during the first 90 days of ownership.
     

2017 Nissan Pathfinder Preview

For the 2017 model year, Nissan gives its 3-row, 7-passenger midsize SUV a freshening. As a result, the 2017 Pathfinder is more appealing than the model it replaces.

Car Articles, News, Tips and Advice

Non-Premium Brands, Led by Kia, Outperform in 2016 Initial Quality Study

Not only does new-vehicle initial quality improve by 6 percentage points this year, but for the first time in a decade, non-premium brands, led by Kia, outperform premium nameplates, according to the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS).

Recall Roundup: Toyota Motor Recalls Prius, Lexus CT Hybrids over Air Bag Inflator Concerns

During the past week, several automakers issued recalls of light vehicles, including model years as far back as 2001. The largest recall comes from Toyota Motor Corp., involving 482,002 Toyota and Lexus vehicles.

IIHS Critical of Passenger-Side Crash Protection in Some Vehicles

Some vehicles that have received a "Good" overall rating in the tough small overlap front crash test performed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) may not provide the same level of safety for front-seat passengers as they do for drivers.

5 Fast Facts: 2016 Chevrolet Silverado HD

The heavy-duty version of the SilveradoChevrolet's full-size pickup truck, comes in 2500HD or 3500HD capacities. For 2016, Chevy has introduced technological upgrades to the integrated cruise control, powertrain grade braking, and diesel exhaust braking.

 

Volkswagen Submits Settlement for U.S. Diesel Owners; Sets Aside Clean Air Funds

Germany's Volkswagen AG recently presented settlement agreements in U.S. District Court in San Francisco that will fund buybacks and early lease terminations, apply approved fixes, and provide cash payments to owners of some 475,000 VWand Audi vehicles in the United States equipped with 2.0-liter diesel engines.

June Auto Sales Led by a Boost in Demand for Trucks

New-car sales in the United States are showing signs of losing steam in the second half of 2016, according to J.D. Power and auto forecasting partner LMC Automotive.

Safety and MPG

Small SUV Headlights Fail to Impress in IIHS Test

Out of the 21 small SUVs tested by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), none earns a "Good" rating (the Institute's highest) in this year's headlight evaluations.

Auto-Related Fatalities Up, Says NHTSA

Preliminary data released recently by the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) reveal that motor traffic deaths rose by 7.7% in 2015, compared with 2014 (35,200 deaths vs. 32,675).

See All Safety and MPG Articles

Sent from Ralph Paglia's iPhone

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Why Lead Pools Dominate Lead Assignment

Why Lead Pools Dominate Lead Assignment


Why Sales Lead Pools and Intelligent Routing Will Dominate Lead Assignment


Assigning leads, a core responsibility of a sales manager. Simply put however, it can be a hassle. Lead assignment requires a great deal of time and energy by knowing the who, what, where, why, and how, for every prospect that funnels into the dealership. This will always, because of human error, have mistakes that occur. A groundwork of rules must be set up to better govern the process, otherwise no dealership will handle them properly. But is this enough? In most cases, NO. So why then do we not look at Lead Pools rather than individual assignment as a means to success? Let's do just that.

  

First we need to look at the basic rules a sales manager uses in assigning leads.
They must allow only truly active salespeople to take the leads, have time limitations set in place, avoid overloading employees, and being "fair". However being "fair" is looking at the dealership by individuals, and not as a whole. The only success that matters is the entirety of the dealership. Then and only then will all individuals "fairly" be triumphant. There are many who have conquered these steps, but again as with anything, human error will have an adverse affect on any rules set in place. This is why the dealership's CRM is so very important. The CRM will help control the pool of leads that come in, and can have guidelines and restrictions for the sales manager to work with. But no matter how well a dealership believes it's CRM is helping in its lead assignment and management, most likely, it can do MUCH more.
A dealership CRM must perform a few strategic actions to succeed in controlling leads that enter into the dealership:
  • Perform the concept of a Lead Pool. Customer ownership allows leads to fall through the cracks, however, with lead pools it's on a first-come, first-serve basis. This type of function allows ALL incoming leads to become readily available for all sales personnel, creating an atmosphere where the LEAD is the center of attention and not the salesperson.
  • The ability to set Lead Response Reserve Times. When you think of lost leads, think lack of response time. Why endure the constant frustration of losing leads to minuscule issues? Setting a reserve time allows the salesperson a designated amount of time to work on the prospect, otherwise the lead will be placed back into the Lead Pool for other dealership personnel to have the chance to work on.
  • Settings that allow for a Minimum/Maximum limitation. Like it or not, salespeople will hog leads. Having the ability to set the number of leads salespeople must have, as well as the maximum number of leads he/she is allowed to have, will create that "fairness" that traditional lead assignment tries but fails to establish.
Having certain intelligent functions in place in a dealership's CRM will have direct results in lead to sale conversion.
CRM technology like CRMSuite's Lead Pool Module, allows the sales manager the ability to set in place the functions that work best for the specific dealership. From there the software takes care of the rest. With a plethora time saved for the sales manager, they are able to concentrate on the dealerships bottom line. Because let's face it, when the dealership succeeds, so do the salespeople that we strive to be "fair" to in lead assignment.